Companies
Review R&D, AI, service innovation, talent, and international programs.
Funding Navigator
In-Stars organizes official sources, eligibility, and document gaps for companies, startups, research teams, and individuals. Official notices remain the final authority.
Start a funding diagnosisReview R&D, AI, service innovation, talent, and international programs.
Align MVP, PoC, joint research, commercialization, and matching-fund needs.
Use a separate talent, competition, course, or project path rather than enterprise programs.
Record the authority, notice page, application period, and last verification date.
Compare applicant identity, topic, budget, schedule, documents, and matching-fund readiness.
Identify worthwhile directions, missing evidence, and reasons a program may not fit.
The first pass classifies the applicant and topic, followed by official notice review. Time-sensitive programs must be checked again against the latest guidance before submission.
Confirm the decision, stakeholders, information boundary, and expected outcome.
Review official resources, data, systems, partners, constraints, and missing evidence.
Agree on scope, roles, schedule, deliverables, and acceptance criteria.
Run a bounded proposal, PoC, study, or market test and record the next decision.
Every item links back to an official source.
A list of evidence, specifications, partners, or financial data still needed.
Proceed to proposal, PoC, collaboration, or pause—with a reason.
The first pass classifies the applicant and topic, followed by official notice review. Time-sensitive programs must be checked again against the latest guidance before submission.
Age, size, industry, region, and intended applicant entity.
Problem, product or service, technical readiness, timing, and budget.
Research, field, Japan needs, matching funds, and internal owner.
If you are unsure where to start, share your organization type, topic, timing, and budget range.